TOP GUIDELINES OF COPY OF CASE LAW JUDGMENTS IN 2013

Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013

Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013

Blog Article

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity with the offense demands the most stringent punishment, taking into consideration the sanctity of human life and deterrence for possible offenders.

4.       Record shows that the petitioner has long been booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in Those people cases, it does, prima facie, build that the petitioner is susceptible to repeating the offence.

The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed within the bank and due to the fact only the appellants were posted within the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, click here with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the target.

Electronic and paper court records retained with the court site may be viewed for the courthouse for free, however there is actually a charge of ten cents per page to print from a public access terminal.

after release from the prison he missing interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, together with case law at both the federal and state levels.

Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses which include self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may lead to reduced charges or acquittal.

10. Without touching the merits of your case of the issue of annual increases while in the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision with the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to get made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions within the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it is important that the case recognized the application on the precautionary principle where there is usually a risk to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations of the State in protecting the right to some clean and healthy environment.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to of your boy’s past, they asked if their children were Safe and sound with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had nothing to fret about.

Report this page